Sanctions
Screen against selected sanctions lists. Compare identifying details and review the source behind each potential match.
AML screening with the full customer context.
Screen for sanctions, watchlists, politically exposed persons (PEPs), and adverse media. Assess potential matches with identifying details, relationships, and source evidence in view.
Screen Customer
Run a screening search against watchlist, high-risk, and custom list sources without creating a customer
Four screening checks. One customer review.
Bring sanctions, watchlist, PEP, and adverse media findings together. Use Dossiers Cosmos or a supported provider with the sources and coverage your policy requires.
Watchlists
Check the watchlists and custom lists relevant to your policy. Retain the list, source record, and review outcome.
Politically exposed persons (PEPs)
Assess potential political exposure. Review public roles and relevant relationships in the context of the customer.
Adverse media
Review articles and source evidence for relevance to your customer. Distinguish allegations from established findings.
Search, compare, and record the outcome
Keep sanctions, watchlist, PEP, and adverse media results connected to the customer’s details and the source evidence throughout review.
Customer context
Start with the customer’s identifying details and verification evidence. Use those details to assess results from your selected sanctions, watchlist, PEP, and adverse media sources.
Customers/CUS-00482
Haruka Tanaka
IndividualActiveMedium riskStandard KYC№
Customer ID
CUS-00482
№
External ID
ACME-482
Verified Identityreconciled from verified documents
Full name
Haruka Tanaka
Date of birth
1985-06-12
Nationality
JPN
Address
24 Example Road, London, United Kingdom
source: Address Document
Checks
Evidence
Documents1
Passport
№EXAMPLE-482JPNVerified
Expires
2030-06-12
DOB on document
1985-06-12
Name on document
Haruka Tanaka
Extracted Fields
Full Name
Haruka Tanaka
DOCUMENT
Date Of Birth
1985-06-12
DOCUMENT
source step: identification_document
Biometrics
Face match
Match
ID document face
Liveness frame
Liveness (selfie)
PassClaimed vs. Documentwhat your records asserted vs. what the document proved
| Field | Claimed | Document | Match |
|---|---|---|---|
| Full Name | Haruka Tanaka | Haruka Tanaka | Match |
| Date Of Birth | 1985-06-12 | 1985-06-12 | Match |
Verification contract v1.0 · provider Dossiers · session ref KYC-00482 · completed 2026-01-14 09:08 UTC
- Names, aliases, and identifiers
- Verified identity and document evidence
- Evidence connected to the customer
Explore the sources and relationships behind a name
Cosmos connects identities, public roles, relationships, and source documents. Follow the evidence that helps your team assess whether a result is relevant to the customer.
Explore regional political exposure and adverse media intelligence alongside your selected screening sources. Review coverage and source requirements with our team.
- Sanctions
- Adverse media
- PEP or public role
- Relative or close associate
- No listing
Read beyond the headline
An adverse media article is one piece of evidence. Review the profile, risk context, and underlying sources together to understand what a finding means for your customer.
Distinguish allegations from established findings. Keep the source and your rationale available for the next review.
Screen Customer
Run a screening search against watchlist, high-risk, and custom list sources without creating a customer
Coverage that fits your policy
Agree the sources, jurisdictions, customer types, and review process your institution needs.
What does AML screening cover?
Screen covers sanctions, watchlists, politically exposed persons (PEPs), and adverse media. Your team reviews potential matches against customer identity details and source evidence, then records the outcome and rationale. Exact source coverage depends on the selected provider and configuration.
Can we use our existing provider?
Dossiers OS supports connected screening providers as well as Dossiers Cosmos. We’ll review the provider connection and the evidence available in your workflow.
Is this customer or payment screening?
This workflow screens customer identities. Transaction rules can use current customer screening context. Payment-message screening and the enforcement of payment decisions require a separately agreed workflow.
How do we evaluate regional coverage?
Bring the jurisdictions, languages, public roles, and source categories relevant to your policy. We’ll walk through the available intelligence and source evidence with your team.
Explore AML screening with us
Walk through sanctions, watchlists, PEPs, and adverse media screening for your customer types and coverage requirements.